Editorial Policy
Every claim NeuroPouch publishes is sourced, dosed-named, and intended to be defensible. We cite peer-reviewed research where it exists, EFSA-authorised wording where it applies, and we say explicitly when an effect rests on ingredient-level evidence rather than a finished-product trial. If we are wrong, we correct it — visibly.
How we research
Our content team reviews primary literature first: PubMed, NCBI Bookshelf, EFSA opinions, and the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements fact sheets. For each ingredient we use, we identify the highest-quality available human evidence at or around the dose used in NeuroPouch, then summarise what it actually shows — not what we wish it showed.
How we write
- Plain dose statements. Every active is named with its mg or µg dose per pouch.
- Evidence framing. We distinguish between mechanism, ingredient-level human trial evidence, and authorised health claims.
- No finished-product overclaim. NeuroPouch as a finished product has not been clinically trialled. We say so on the Science page and elsewhere.
- Plain English first. Technical terms are introduced and defined, not used to impress.
How we review
Every Learn article and every claim on the Science page is reviewed before publication for: factual accuracy against cited sources, alignment with EFSA Regulation 1924/2006 health-claim rules, and clarity. Articles carry a "Last updated" date and are revisited when underlying evidence changes.
Authorship
Content on getneuropouch.com is published under the byline NeuroPouch Team. Our team includes contributors with backgrounds in food-supplement regulation, pharmacology, and consumer health writing. Where individual expert review or contribution is added in future, the contributor will be named on the page.
Citations
Where we cite a study, we link to PubMed or the publishing journal. Where we cite EFSA, we link to the relevant opinion or to the EU register of nutrition and health claims. Where we cite the NIH ODS, we link to the relevant Health Professional fact sheet.
What we don’t do
- We do not make disease, treatment, cure, or prevention claims.
- We do not use unauthorised health claims for caffeine, L-theanine, Alpha-GPC or Rhodiola in marketing.
- We do not buy reviews or use fabricated testimonials.
- We do not publish AI-generated content without human editorial review against sources.
Corrections
If we publish something inaccurate, we correct the page and note the correction. Email editorial@getneuropouch.com with the URL and the issue.
Conflicts of interest
NeuroPouch is the manufacturer of the product the site sells. Content is written by the brand, not by independent third parties. We acknowledge this conflict and structure content to address it: all health-relevant claims are sourced; the product’s limits and contraindications are stated as prominently as its benefits.
Contact
Editorial questions, corrections, source requests: editorial@getneuropouch.com.